Clustered SQL Instance on VM vs physical server
In my experience there is a like 10% degree but many Physical servers are running only 20% usage that actually doesn't matter in many cases. Troubleshooting might be harder in virtualized but with...
View ArticleClustered SQL Instance on VM vs physical server
As already pointed out there is a performance hit when you run SQL Server in a VM instead of on a dedicated physical machine. Since the server you're asking about is clustered I'm going to assume it...
View ArticleClustered SQL Instance on VM vs physical server
From my experience I see that performance is better on the physical server BUT it depends on many thingsBest Regards,Uri Dimant SQL Server MVP,http://sqlblog.com/blogs/uri_dimant/ MS SQL optimization:...
View ArticleClustered SQL Instance on VM vs physical server
I guess most people will say the difference might not be major, however, one thing to look out for is the IO, as it needs to go through VM layer then to the physical IO layer, so it should be a touch...
View ArticleClustered SQL Instance on VM vs physical server
Hi Satya,https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/f7efb3b5-4898-46f7-b896-e0395182fb43/sql-server-physical-vs-virtual-enviornment-?forum=sqlsetupandupgradeRegards,NavinNavin.D...
View ArticleClustered SQL Instance on VM vs physical server
Is there any performance difference in having a SQL Instance hosted on a cluster with 2 VM nodes vs 2 physical nodes?
View Article
